On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:43:01PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > I actually hadn't been running 125 because it wasn't in the auto group, Dave > > noticed it, I just tried it on this VM and hit it right away. No worries, > > that's why we have the CI stuff, sometimes it just doesn't trigger for us but > > will trigger with the CI setup. Thanks, > > Oh, I guess the lack of auto group means I've never tested it. But > it's a fairly bad bug, and I'm surprised nothing in auto hits an > error after a bio split. I'll need to find out if I can find a simpler > reproducer as this warrants a regression test. The 'auto' group is good for first tests, I'm running 'check -g all' on my VM setups. If this is enough to trigger errors then we probably don't need a separate regression test.
