evanhensbergen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:33:46PM -0600: > I’m fine with funneling these through Dominique since he’s currently > the active maintainer, but I’ve also re-established kernel.org > <http://kernel.org/> credentials so I can field the pull-request if > desired. I'm happy either way; I've had a (too quick to really call review) look at the code itself and it mostly makes sense to me, and as you pointed out some would warrant a Cc stable@ and not waiting if I had time to do this seriously, but I'm not sure I'll make it if this needs to wait for me. Do you also have a tree that goes in -next ? I think I asked before but lost your reply, sorry. If not it'll probably be easier for me to pick it up this cycle, but that's about the only reason I'd see for me to take the patches as things stand. -- Dominique
