Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:46:39AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Last time I brought the idea of a small in-tree test harness up at KS >> people weren't too fond of it, but if we get more backing now we could >> try it, otherwise we can just stick it into xfsqa which will hopefully >> soon be generalized to a general fs QA suite. > > Two questions --- first of all, has there been any progress with > respect to fixing the licensing of the xfsqa tree. (i.e., "All Rights > Reserved" needs to change to a GPLv2 license)? Given that we are not lawyers: The current kernel tree contains >3500 files that contain the phrase "All Rights Reserved". Are they a problem? -- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
