On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:12:22PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > The changelog sounds like a good cover letter for a series, overall > description but lacks more details. So, I've done a massive split, but I need guidance on what you want for a changelog. There is one bit here which I've incorporated: > - use of mempool must be mentioned in the changelog with explanation > that it's the safe usage pattern and why it cannot lead to lockups but otherwise I'm at at loss. Do you want descriptions of what the low-level changes are counter to the normal normal Linux way of explain why the changes are done an what the high level design decisions are? Or is there something else that is not obvious from the patch and needs more elaboration? I can't really think of much that's missing, but maybe it's easy to overlook important points when you've been staring at the code for half a year. Here is the current commit text: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/c88b5ef41a8e0b5daf645eea415ade683e2d8b72
