Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:13:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:16:49 -0400 >> Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Here is small little program which I and Eric have been working on this week to >>> better test FIEMAP >> I for one wouldn't complain were someone to create >> Documentation/fs/tests/ and to then start filling it with stuff. > > Why oh why do people think Documentation/ is a good place for code? > > tests/ would be a much better place :) > > Last time I brought the idea of a small in-tree test harness up at KS > people weren't too fond of it, but if we get more backing now we could > try it, otherwise we can just stick it into xfsqa which will hopefully > soon be generalized to a general fs QA suite. FWIW, the xfsprogs test suite git tree is currently at 11M; and that's mostly just for one subtype of one subsystem. Aiming to have a full kernel test suite in the kernel tree sounds lke it could get unwieldy to me... I'll stick this new test into xfstests regardless, for now... -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
