Re: [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:16:13AM +0800, maobibo wrote:
> Hongchen,
> 
> I have a glance with this patch, it simply replaces with
> spinlock_irqsave with mutex lock. There may be performance
> improvement with two processes competing with pipe, however
> for N processes, there will be complex context switches
> and ipi interruptts.
> 
> Can you find some cases with more than 2 processes competing
> pipe, rather than only unixbench?

What real applications have pipes with more than 1 writer & 1 reader?
I'm OK with slowing down the weird cases if the common cases go faster.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux