Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: Document the reflink(2) system call.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:12:36PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Joel Becker wrote:
> > 	The point-in-time of the snapshot is what's important here.
> 
> Don't we have a slight problem that useful point-in-time snapshots
> really need to snapshot whole directory trees?  Otherwise you get the
> same inter-file inconsistency issues that you get intra-file from old
> fashioned copying.

	Snapshotting whole trees is already doable from things like
btrfs and from whole volumes on your storage.  This is a different
beast.
	Inter-file is a lot easier to handle than intra-file, because
you have control over that part of the process.
	And if your file is actually a disk image, you get snapping of
disks for free :-)

Joel

-- 

"We'd better get back, `cause it'll be dark soon,
 and they mostly come at night.  Mostly."

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux