Hi, On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 22:01 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > I am trying to understand whether this patch is correct. > > One thing that would help would be to use more standard naming: > > ep_put => ep_refcount_dec_and_test (or ep_put_and_test) > ep_dispose => ep_free > ep_free => ep_clear_and_put Thank you for the feedback. I must admit I'm not good at all at selecting good names, so I definitelly will apply the above. I additionally still have to cover the feedback from Jacob - switching the reference count to a kref - as I've been diverted to other tasks. I hope to be able to share a new revision of this patch next week. Thanks, Paolo
