On 30.11.22 11:30, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [Note: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and/or for > regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. That's why I removed > most or all folks from the list of recipients, but left any that looked > like a mailing lists. These mails usually contain '#forregzbot' in the > subject, to make them easy to spot and filter out.] > > On 24.11.22 15:54, Shiyang Ruan wrote: >> Many testcases failed in dax+reflink mode with warning message in dmesg. >> This also effects dax+noreflink mode if we run the test after a >> dax+reflink test. So, the most urgent thing is solving the warning >> messages. > > Darrick in https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y4bZGvP8Ozp+4De%2F@magnolia/ > wrote "dax and reflink are totally broken on 6.1". Hence, add this to > the tracking to be sure it's not forgotten. > > #regzbot ^introduced 35fcd75af3ed > #regzbot title xfs/dax/reflink are totally broken on 6.1 > #regzbot ignore-activity #regzbot inconclusive complex issue; fixes with backports apparently planed to be merged for 6.2 Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
