On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:42:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Matthew's idea of checking with SFLC seems to me to have some merit. > I am looking into this from my end. Of course, you and Al and Christoph > have just as much standing to ask SFLC as do I, and perhaps more. OK, enough. Any further communication on that topic should be filtered through lawyers, since you apparently refuse to provide details of rationale for your changes due to some kind of legal issues. Whether you have a reason for such behaviour or not, continuing that thread is obviously pointless. If you want a useful review, it is up to you to figure out the procedure that (a) would allow answering such questions when asked by those who will be reviewing it (b) satisfy whatever legal concerns you might have about (a) (c) satisfy whatever legal concerns said reviewers might have regarding the procedure in question, whatever that procedure turns out to be. (d) satisfy whatever legal concerns employers of said reviewers might have. Until then all you are doing is busily making an ass of yourself in public and possibly compounding whatever legal issues you might have. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
