On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 15-11-22 20:20:01, Svyatoslav Feldsherov wrote: > > After commit cbfecb927f42 ("fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode > > already has I_DIRTY_INODE") writeback_single_inode can push inode with > > I_DIRTY_TIME set to b_dirty_time list. In case of freeing inode with > > I_DIRTY_TIME set this can happen after deletion of inode from i_io_list > > at evict. Stack trace is following. > > > > evict > > fat_evict_inode > > fat_truncate_blocks > > fat_flush_inodes > > writeback_inode > > sync_inode_metadata(inode, sync=0) > > writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc) <- wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE > > > > This will lead to use after free in flusher thread. > > > > Similar issue can be triggered if writeback_single_inode in the > > stack trace update inode->i_io_list. Add explicit check to avoid it. > > > > Fixes: cbfecb927f42 ("fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE") > > Reported-by: syzbot+6ba92bd00d5093f7e371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Feldsherov <feldsherov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Ted, I guess you will merge this patch since you've merged the one from > Lukas this patch is fixing? Sorry, I forgot to ack this earlier, but this was pushed to Linus and it's in 6.1-rc7. - Ted