On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 04:59:11AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 09:48:18AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Would it be wise to "persist" dquot contents to a (private) tmpfs file > > to facilitate incore dquot reclaim? The tmpfs file data can be paged > > out, or even punched if all the dquot records in that page go back to > > default settings. > > That seems like a good idea for memory usage, but I think this might > also make the code much simpler, as that just requires fairly trivial > quota_read and quota_write methods in the shmem code instead of new > support for an in-memory quota file. You mean like the implementation in the v1 ? -Lukas
