On Sat 2009-05-02 19:30:02, tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > > At that point you shouldn't even bother to send a patch. > > The non-technical reasons for this patch are available to anyone who > cares to read any of the many news sites that discuss recent > events. The fact that I can't discuss those reasons shouldn't preclude Is reading /. now required part of patch reviewer's day? You are 1) submitting the patch 2) saying that reasons for it are non-technical and obvious 3) saying that you can't tell us the reasons. Well if they are obvious, please get us someone who _can_ discuss them with us. Preferably a lawyer that can explain why the patch is neccessary. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
