On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 05:06:03PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:25:31PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > The sysctl_numa_balancing_promote_rate_limit and sysctl_numa_balancing > > are part of sched, move them to its own file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There is quite a bit of random cleanup on each kernel release > for sysctls to do things like what you just did. Because of this it has its > own tree to help avoid conflicts. Can you base your patches on the > sysctl-testing branch here and re-submit: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=sysctl-testing > > If testing goes fine, then I'd move this to sysctl-next which linux-next > picks up for yet more testing. > > Are scheduling folks OK with this patch and me picking it up on the > sysctl-next tree if all tests are a go? Yeah, think so, it just moves stuff around a bit. ACK.
