Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fix unexpected changes to {failslab|fail_page_alloc}.attr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2022/11/19 05:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:00:11 +0800 Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When we specify __GFP_NOWARN, we only expect that no warnings
will be issued for current caller. But in the __should_failslab()
and __should_fail_alloc_page(), the local GFP flags alter the
global {failslab|fail_page_alloc}.attr, which is persistent and
shared by all tasks. This is not what we expected, let's fix it.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 3f913fc5f974 ("mm: fix missing handler for __GFP_NOWARN")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>

...

-bool should_fail(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size)
+bool should_fail_ex(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size, int flags)
  {
  	bool stack_checked = false;
@@ -152,13 +149,20 @@ bool should_fail(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size)
  		return false;
fail:
-	fail_dump(attr);
+	if (!(flags & FAULT_NOWARN))
+		fail_dump(attr);
if (atomic_read(&attr->times) != -1)
  		atomic_dec_not_zero(&attr->times);
return true;
  }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(should_fail_ex);

I don't see a need to export this?

Yes, my initial thought was that there might be a driver using this
function, but there really isn't one yet.

And I see you've helped remove this, thanks a lot. :)




--
Thanks,
Qi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux