On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:47:10PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > And, there actually are options like CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL and > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY. Because these exist already, I did not expect > too much concerns with proposing a CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION... ext4 is a little weird there as most file systems don't do that. So I think these should go away for ext4 as well. > Note that even with the additional options, enabling only > CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION causes all the filesystems that support fscrypt to > have it enabled. For users there is no change, except that they now have > an option to disable fscrypt support per filesystem. But why would you do that anyay?
