On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:21:21AM -0700, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > But I am not sure if we really don't want to issue the fault injection > stack in this case. It's not a WARNING, it's merely an information > message. It looks useful in all cases, even with GFP_NOWARN. Why > should it be suppressed? I think it is fine to suppress it for *this call* but the bug turns it off forever more Jason
