We recently received a patch for fs/exportfs/expfs.c, but there isn't a subsystem maintainer listed for fs/exportfs: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:2/2=100%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3/6=50%,removed_lines:2/6=33%) Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,added_lines:3/6=50%,removed_lines:4/6=67%) Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:1/2=50%) Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:1/2=50%) linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list) Neil says: > Looking at recent commits, patches come in through multiple > different trees. > nfsd certainly has an interest in expfs.c. The only other user is > name_to_handle/open_by_handle API. > I see it as primarily nfsd functionality which is useful enough to > be exported directly to user-space. > (It was created by me when I was nfsd maintainer - does that > count?) Suggested-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) The patch description in v1 was truncated. Here's a refresh. diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 379945f82a64..61fb45cfc825 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -11129,6 +11129,7 @@ L: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S: Supported W: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git +F: fs/exportfs/ F: fs/lockd/ F: fs/nfs_common/ F: fs/nfsd/
