On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:34:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:30 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Went through the callers, replaced each with the right ITER_... (there's > > not that many of them and they are fairly easy to review), then went > > through mismatches and split their fixups into the beginning of the > > series (READ -> ITER_SOURCE becoming READ -> WRITE -> ITER_SOURCE, that > > is). > > Oh, ok. So if you've actually reviewed each and every one of them, > then I'm ok with the "abort". > > I still want it to be a WARN_ON_ONCE(), because of any future addition > that gets things wrong. Sure, np; branch updated and pushed out - the only difference is that 11/12 adds WARN_ON_ONCE instead of WARN_ON, so no point reposting, IMO...
