From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/super.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c index 8d39e4f11cfa..ca791da59c98 100644 --- a/fs/super.c +++ b/fs/super.c @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ struct super_block *sget_fc(struct fs_context *fc, fc->s_fs_info = NULL; s->s_type = fc->fs_type; s->s_iflags |= fc->s_iflags; - strlcpy(s->s_id, s->s_type->name, sizeof(s->s_id)); + strscpy(s->s_id, s->s_type->name, sizeof(s->s_id)); list_add_tail(&s->s_list, &super_blocks); hlist_add_head(&s->s_instances, &s->s_type->fs_supers); spin_unlock(&sb_lock); @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ struct super_block *sget(struct file_system_type *type, return ERR_PTR(err); } s->s_type = type; - strlcpy(s->s_id, type->name, sizeof(s->s_id)); + strscpy(s->s_id, type->name, sizeof(s->s_id)); list_add_tail(&s->s_list, &super_blocks); hlist_add_head(&s->s_instances, &type->fs_supers); spin_unlock(&sb_lock); -- 2.25.1
