On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:16 AM Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +static int proc_readfd_count(struct inode *inode) > > +{ > > + struct task_struct *p = get_proc_task(inode); > > + struct fdtable *fdt; > > + unsigned int open_fds = 0; > > + > > + if (!p) > > + return -ENOENT; > > Maybe this shouldn't happen, but do you mean to assign the error code to > stat->size in the caller? Otherwise this seems reasonable to me. You are right. As unlikely as it is to happen, we shouldn't return negative size. What's the idiomatic way to make this work? My two options are: 1. Pass &stat->size into proc_readfd_count: if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { rv = proc_readfd_count(inode, &stat->size); if (rv < 0) goto out; } out: return rv; OR without a goto: if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { rv = proc_readfd_count(inode, &stat->size)); if (rv < 0) return rv; } return rv; 2. Return negative count as error (as we don't expect negative amount of files open): if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { size = proc_readfd_count(inode); if (size < 0) return size; stat->size = size; }