Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfs: umount_begin BKL pushdown v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 07:55:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Nah, it's not that.  I can hold that in a separate branch and keep it
> anchored.  The question is, what else will end up there?
> 	* the work inside the methods on BKL _removal_
> 	* things like merging that ->write_super() call into ->put_super(),
> etc.
> 	* probably parts of work on s_flags mess and ro (tied to remout)

	* moving lock_super from callers into ->write_super and
	  ->remount_fs.  No need to only push one lock down when we
	  touch them anyway.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux