Re: [PATCH 3/2] check_unsafe_exec: rcu_read_unlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/24, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> --- 2.6.30-rc3-next-20090424/fs/exec.c	2009-04-24 12:23:43.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/exec.c	2009-04-24 12:26:10.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ int check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binpr
>  		if (t->fs == p->fs)
>  			n_fs++;
>  	}
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> +	rcu_read_unlock();

I'd say this change is not bad. Except it discloses the fact I didn't
bother to test my trivial patch.

Thanks a lot Hugh!!!

And my apologies to all.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux