On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Another thing I want to do in this area is sort out the meaning of > > write_super. I'd really prefer to have every filesystem implement > > ->sync_fs for actual data-integerity syncs, and only leave ->write_super > > for the periodic writeouts, as the current implementation is extrenly > > confusing and causes a lot of trouble for filesystems doing their own > > periodic sb writeback. > Yes, that would be nice but I guess it's a partly a separate issue > (and has to touch a lot of filesystems). I'll keep write_supers() call in > the next version of the patch so that this split isn't made harded by it. Yeah, separate issue. We need to do this sync massaging in a couple of small steps.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
