Re: [RFC PATCH] fpathconf() for fsync() behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Tso wrote:
So we can create a more finer-grained controlled system call ---
although I would suggest that we just add some extra flags to
sync_file_range() --- but it's doubtful that many application
programmers will use it.

sync_file_range() seems the obvious avenue for new fsync flags.

I even explored what it would take to add a "flush storage dev writeback cache, for this file" flag to sync_file_range(), rather unfortunately non-trivial given the current implementation's close ties to MM.

But yeah...  how many people will use these fancy new flags and features?

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux