On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:38:47PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Apr 21, 2009 01:25 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > a) ramfs has no such thing as "amount of available space", simply > > because it has no limit on total size occupied. > > Well, except the amount of RAM in the system, which would be a reasonable > value to use. You are welcome to provide an analysis of differences between the moments when OOM hits root and non-root resp. if they keep allocating there... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
