Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] erofs: introduce fscache-based domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/2/22 6:53 PM, Jia Zhu wrote:

>  int erofs_fscache_register_cookie(struct super_block *sb,
>  				  struct erofs_fscache **fscache,
>  				  char *name, bool need_inode)
> @@ -495,7 +581,8 @@ int erofs_fscache_register_fs(struct super_block *sb)
>  	char *name;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s", sbi->opt.fsid);
> +	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s",
> +			sbi->domain ? sbi->domain->domain_id : sbi->opt.fsid);
>  	if (!name)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  

What if domain_id and fsid has the same value?

How about the format "erofs,<domain_id>,<fsid>"? While in the
non-share-domain mode, is the format like "erofs,,<fsid>" or the default
"erofs,<fsid>"?


-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux