On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:24:28AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> I think any data that requires to be interpreteted by the VFS needs to
> have dedicated methods. Seth's branch for example, tries to add
> i_op->{g,s}et_vfs_caps() for vfs caps which also store ownership
> information instead of hacking it through the xattr api like we do now.
Yes. Although with LSMs this will become really messy, but then again
creating a complete unreviewable und auditable mess is what the LSM
infrastructure was created for to start with..
