On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 10:46:13AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 9/1/22 16:42, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The current btrfs zoned device support is a little cumbersome in the data > > I/O path as it requires the callers to not support more I/O than the > > supported ZONE_APPEND size by the underlying device. This leads to a lot > > Did you mean: "...as it requires the callers to not issue I/O larger than > the supported ZONE_APPEND size for the underlying device." ? > I think you do mean that :) Yes.
