On Wednesday 15 April 2009 00:32:52 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:26:34AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Andrea: I didn't veto that set_bit change of yours as such. I just > > I know you didn't ;) > > > noted there could be more atomic operations. Actually I would > > welcome more comparison between our two approaches, but they seem > > Agree about the welcome of comparison, it'd be nice to measure it the > enterprise workloads that showed the gup_fast gain in the first place. I think we should be able to ask IBM to run some tests, provided they still have machines available to do so. Although I don't want to waste their time so we need to have something that has got past initial code review and has a chance of being merged. If we get that far, then I can ask them to run tests definitely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
