Hi Tim, > Minor nit, but the subject line has nsfs when I think it means ntfs. > -- Tim Thanks, will be fixed in v2. How about XFS using 300 MB vs 16 MB but using different code paths? How big deal it'd be if we require 300 MB in case testing on kernel with XFS enabled and xfsprogs installed? https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/YwyYUzvlxfIGpTwo@yuki/ https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/YwyljsgYIK3AvUr+@pevik/ Kind regards, Petr
