Re: Attempt at "stat light" implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> As for making the interface extendable.  In all the years there hasn't
> really been much need to extend the stat structure (ignoring extended
> attributes).  So, I'd not be worried about using a simple 32-bit
> bitmask to select the fields to include in the fast stat.

I agree about 32 bits being enough.

I think there has been some demand for new fields, but it's not been
strong enough to justify all the breakage from changing the normal
stat structure.

That's why we have generic filesystem ioctls: FS_IOC_GETFLAGS,
FS_IOC_GETVERSION, which return things which would naturally go with
stat if it were free to do so (but it isn't).

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux