Christoph Hellwig: > No, we've always said that we want to do vfs-level union mounts, and > at the storage summit we've actually moved forward on that and Jan > and Val are sorting some of the remaining issues now. VFS-level union is promising. Actually I am going to try that after aufs in the future. I didn't know that people re-started working on union mount. It is interesting. I have been asked to include aufs into mainline from several people several times. As long as you have strong NACK for aufs and reject all union-type filesystems, I have to give up unwillingly and will answer them "Aufs was rejected. Let's give it up." J. R. Okajima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html