On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:37:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:41:47PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This introduces `KSYM_NAME_LEN_BUFFER` in place of the previously > > hardcoded size of the input buffer. > > > > It will also make it easier to update the size in a single place > > in a later patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > > Co-developed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Does someone want to commit to taking these "prereq" patches? These > clean-ups are nice even without adding Rust. Qouting Message-ID: <CANiq72mXDne_WkUCo2oRe+sip7nQWESnouOJrcCYzyJMkG8F6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANiq72mXDne_WkUCo2oRe+sip7nQWESnouOJrcCYzyJMkG8F6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Miguel Ojeda, 2022-08-05: | > And I think that this patch and all other "rust" kallsyms patches | > allready should have been accepted in the v3 or v5 series. | | Yeah, it could be a good idea to get the prerequisites in first. | Let's see if the patches get some Reviewed-bys Now that there is a 'Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>' Regards Geert Stappers In an attempt to help making Rust for Linux happen. -- Silence is hard to parse
