Re: [PATCH] radix tree test suite: Parameter type completion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Xin Gao <gaoxin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] radix tree test suite: Parameter type completion
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:48:07 +0100
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220808152142.59327-1-gaoxin@cdjrlc.com>

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 11:21:42PM +0800, Xin Gao wrote:
> 'unsigned int' is better than 'unsigned', which has several changes.

I don't agree that unsigned int is better than a plain unsigned.

References:
- [PATCH] radix tree test suite: Parameter type completion
  - From: Xin Gao

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5] add barriers to buffer functions
Next by Date: [GIT PULL] sysctl changes for v6.0-rc1
Previous by thread: [PATCH] radix tree test suite: Parameter type completion
Next by thread: [GIT PULL] sysctl changes for v6.0-rc1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux