On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:09:23 -0700 > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Admittedly I think "preempt_enable_under_spinlock()" may be a bit > > *too* cumbersome as a name. It does explain what is going on - and > > both the implementation and the use end up being fairly clear (and the > > non-RT case could have some debug version that actually tests that > > preemption has already been disabled). > > preempt_disable_inlock() ? preempt_disable_locked()?
