On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 04:00:43PM -0300, Enzo Matsumiya wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the ongoing effort to remove the "cifs" nomenclature from the > Linux SMB client, I'm proposing the rename of the module to "smbfs". > > As it's widely known, CIFS is associated to SMB1.0, which, in turn, is > associated with the security issues it presented in the past. Using > "SMBFS" makes clear what's the protocol in use for outsiders, but also > unties it from any particular protocol version. It also fits in the > already existing "fs/smbfs_common" and "fs/ksmbd" naming scheme. > > This short patch series only changes directory names and includes/ifdefs in > headers and source code, and updates docs to reflect the rename. Other > than that, no source code/functionality is modified (WIP though). Why did you not reply to Jeff Layton's concern before posting a v2?
