Re: [PATCH 2/3] vfs: add propagate_mount_tree_busy() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 20/7/22 09:54, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:37:46AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:

+static int do_mount_in_use_check(struct mount *mnt, int cnt)
+{
+	struct mount *topper;
+
+	/* Is there exactly one mount on the child that covers
+	 * it completely?
+	 */
+	topper = find_topper(mnt);
+	if (topper) {
+		int topper_cnt = topper->mnt_mounts_cnt + 1;
+
+		/* Open file or pwd within singular mount? */
+		if (do_refcount_check(topper, topper_cnt))
+			return 1;
Whatever the hell for?  umount(2) will be able to slide the
underlying mount from under the topper, whatever the
refcount of topper might have been.

My thinking was that a process could have set a working

directory (or opened a descriptor) and some later change

to an autofs map resulted in it being mounted on. It's

irrelevant now with your suggested simpler approach, ;)


Ian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux