Re: Attempt at "stat light" implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:54:31AM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> In the end it DOES seem that fstatat(2) is a sufficient interface for
>> this:
>>
>>       int fstatat(int dirfd, const char *pathname, struct stat *buf,
>> 		   int flags);
>> since it is working on the directory and passing in the filenames
>> for each file.  There is even a AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW to avoid the
>> need to have a separate "l" version.
>
> I thought about it, but unless we would allow userspace to pass in
> the magic AT_FDCWD, they would still would need to open something
> even if only once per run (and probably once per dir, to avoid
> extra lookup overhead), and that is probably not very desirable.

AT_FDCWD is part of the Posix-specified *at interface and can be passed
in from userspace since day1.  Apropos Posix, you should probably talk
to Uli Drepper about exposing these things in glibc and possibly
standardizing it through Austin group (or whatever replaced it)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux