Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Darrik,

Thanks for the reply.

>> +
>> +/**
>> + * __blkdev_issue_verify - generate number of verify operations
>> + * @bdev:	blockdev to issue
>> + * @sector:	start sector
>> + * @nr_sects:	number of sectors to verify
>> + * @gfp_mask:	memory allocation flags (for bio_alloc())
>> + * @biop:	pointer to anchor bio
>> + *
>> + * Description:
>> + *  Verify a block range using hardware offload.
>> + *
>> + * The function will emulate verify operation if no explicit hardware
>> + * offloading for verifying is provided.
>> + */
>> +int __blkdev_issue_verify(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>> +		sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio **biop)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int max_verify_sectors = bdev_verify_sectors(bdev);
>> +	sector_t min_io_sect = (BIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 9;
>> +	struct bio *bio = *biop;
>> +	sector_t curr_sects;
>> +	char *buf;
>> +
>> +	if (!max_verify_sectors) {
>> +		int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +		buf = kzalloc(min_io_sect << 9, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> k*z*alloc?  I don't think you need to zero a buffer that we're reading
> into, right?
> 
> --D

we don't need to but I guess it is just a habit to make sure alloced
buffer is zeored, should I remove it for any particular reason ?

-ck






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux