On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:25 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Originally I called that kfs{g,u}id_t but I was never happy with that
> either... I think either vfs{g,u}id_t or fs_{g,u}id_t makes sense.
vfs[gu]id sounds good to me. That way we avoid the confusion with our
current "cred->fsuid" thing due to the access() system call.
Linus
