Re: [PATCH] filemap: obey mapping->invalidate_lock lock/unlock order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 04:38:20PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> The invalidate_locks of two mappings should be unlocked in reverse order
> relative to the locking order in filemap_invalidate_lock_two(). Modifying

Why?  It's perfectly valid to lock(A) lock(B) unlock(A) unlock(B).
If it weren't we'd have lockdep check it and complain.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux