On (22/06/13 17:54), Alexandru Elisei wrote: [..] > [ 0.000000] clocksource: arch_sys_counter: mask: 0xffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x588fe9dc0, max_idle_ns: 440795202592 ns > [ 0.000001] sched_clock: 56 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 4398046511097ns > [ 0.005107] Console: colour dummy device 80x25 > [ 0.005549] printk: console [tty0] enabled > [ 0.005956] printk: bootconsole [uart0] disabled > > Config can be found at [1] (expires after 6 months). I've also built the > kernel with gcc 10.3.1 [2] (aarch64-none-linux-gnu), same issue. > > I've bisected the build failure to commit 10e14073107d ("writeback: Fix > inode->i_io_list not be protected by inode->i_lock error"); I've confirmed > that that commit is responsible by successfully booting the board with a > kernel built from v5.19-rc2 + the above commit reverted. Hmm, interesting and puzzling. If you disable console kthreads (__printk_fallback_preferred_direct) and keep 10e14073107d, are you able to successfully boot the board or does it boot to a panic? > I tried to do some investigating, it seems that the kernel is stuck at > printk.c::console_init() -> drivers/tty/vt/vt.c::con_init() -> > printk.c::register_console() -> unregister_console() -> console_lock(). Is it console lock (console_kthreads_block() -> mutex_lock(&con->lock)) that we cannot grab or is it console semaphore?