On 6/3/22 3:12 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 02-06-22 14:00:38, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/2/22 2:06 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> On Wed 01-06-22 14:01:36, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>>>> This adds a file_modified_async() function to return -EAGAIN if the
>>>> request either requires to remove privileges or needs to update the file
>>>> modification time. This is required for async buffered writes, so the
>>>> request gets handled in the io worker of io-uring.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I've found one small bug here:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
>>>> index c44573a32c6a..4503bed063e7 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/inode.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/inode.c
>>> ...
>>>> -int file_modified(struct file *file)
>>>> +static int file_modified_flags(struct file *file, int flags)
>>>> {
>>>> int ret;
>>>> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>>>
>>> We need to use 'flags' for __file_remove_privs_flags() call in this patch.
>>>
>>
>> I assume that you meant that the function should not be called _file_remove_privs(),
>> but instead file_remove_privs_flags(). Is that correct?
>
> No, I meant that patch 8 adds call __file_remove_privs(..., 0) to
> file_modified() and this patch then forgets to update that call to
> __file_remove_privs(..., flags) so that information propagates properly.
>
Thanks for the explanation, I made the change.
> Honza
>
