Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 00:01:22 -0700
Cc: io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220526173840.578265-9-shr@fb.com>

This patch itself looks fine, but I think with how the next patch goes
we don't even need it anymore, do we?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time
  - From: Stefan Roesch

References:
- [PATCH v6 00/16] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes
  - From: Stefan Roesch
- [PATCH v6 08/16] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time
  - From: Stefan Roesch

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 07/16] fs: add __remove_file_privs() with flags parameter
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 09/16] fs: Add async write file modification handling.
Previous by thread: [PATCH v6 08/16] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] fs: Split off inode_needs_update_time and __file_update_time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux