Re: [PATCH 16/24] iomap: Remove test for folio error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 04:50:28PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Just because there has been a read error doesn't mean we should avoid
> marking this part of the folio as uptodate.  Indeed, it may overwrite
> the error part of the folio and let us mark the entire folio uptodate.

This does look sensible, but I'm a little worried about this area.

Did this survive an xfstests run with a sub-pagesize blocksize file
system?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux