Re: [PATCHv4 8/9] block: relax direct io memory alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 8/9] block: relax direct io memory alignment
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 00:29:41 -0700
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@xxxxxx>, hch@xxxxxx, bvanassche@xxxxxxx, damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pankydev8@xxxxxxxxx, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220526010613.4016118-9-kbusch@fb.com>

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 06:06:12PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Each segment in the iov is required to be a block size multiple.

Where is this enforced?

- Eric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCHv4 8/9] block: relax direct io memory alignment
  - From: Keith Busch

References:
- [PATCHv4 0/9] direct io dma alignment
  - From: Keith Busch
- [PATCHv4 8/9] block: relax direct io memory alignment
  - From: Keith Busch

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] Writeback and ext2 cleanups for 5.19-rc1
Next by Date: Re: [PATCHv4 3/9] block: export dma_alignment attribute
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 8/9] block: relax direct io memory alignment
Next by thread: Re: [PATCHv4 8/9] block: relax direct io memory alignment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux