On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:55:39AM +1100, npiggin@xxxxxxx wrote: > This is my sketch for improving dcache locking scalability. So far I've > only really been looking at core code to get an idea of how it might look, > so most configurable functionality is broken (and unfortunately it might > well be something in there which will cause a fundamental problem for me). Umm... Some of that makes obvious sense per se, some... In particular, all of a sudden we get contention between multiple dput() on the same dentry, which is dirt-common for directory ones. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
