Re: [PATCH] fs/namei.c:reserve_stack(): tidy up the call of try_to_unlazy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/namei.c:reserve_stack(): tidy up the call of try_to_unlazy()
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 13:48:11 +0200
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <YocIYPe1p5dJTBXc@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:17:52AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> !foo() != 0 is a strange way to spell !foo(); fallout from
> "fs: make unlazy_walk() error handling consistent"...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHES] stuff from the last cycle that missed the window
  - From: Al Viro
- [PATCH] fs/namei.c:reserve_stack(): tidy up the call of try_to_unlazy()
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] linux/mount.h: trim includes
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] statx: add I/O alignment information
Previous by thread: [PATCH] fs/namei.c:reserve_stack(): tidy up the call of try_to_unlazy()
Next by thread: [PATCH] get rid of dead code in legitimize_root()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux