Another approach which occurs to me would be to come up with a "filesystem over USB" protocol so that the actual on-disk format is no longer relevant. With a standard or reasonably common FSoUSB implementation, a device maker could choose a disk filesystem that's appropriate to their purpose and hide the implementation details within the device. For instance, an MP3 player could use a flash-specific disk filesystem but would be able hide the details of this from the host PC. This might not be so desirable for simple devices (like USB card readers, perhaps) but I imagine it would fairly straightforward on media players, GPSes, etc that run a "proper" OS. The most pain would arguably be in *somebody* having to write a filesystem driver for Windows but at least it would only need writing once ;-) I've seen some talk of this sort of approach online but nothing too specific. A Linux USB website suggested that a certain camera protocol might be suitable as a basis for files-over-USB (there's even a FUSE module for this, I think). Another possibility that occurs would be to write a USB transport for 9P, which looked like it might be fairly straightforward... Just a thought, anyhow. Cheers, Mark On Tuesday 31 March 2009 09:15:28 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > Now as TomTom appears to have surrendered to Microsoft and Microsoft seems > to have accepted this deal probably in order to not find out that their > patents are void, I think replacing VFAT as standard cross platform > filesystem on removeable media would be an even better idea than before > [1]. > > Granted I believe the patents will be made void one day, but even then I > think it would make sense to replace VFAT for technical reasons. > > Such a filesystem IMHO should have the following features: > - cross platform with implementations for Linux, Windows, Mac OS X at > least, also the varios BSD variantes come to my mind > - open source > - probably some support for flash media without or with bad wear leveling > - some kind of journaling or other metadata consistency guarentee > > People use ext2 as an alternative, but that lacks journaling. > > I could also think of UDF with write support, but I am not sure whether > Windows and Mac OS X has write support. > > Or probably even a new filesystem as long as people appear to write one > filesystem after another these days. > > Or some kind of FAT *without* compatibility hacks, but I think this would > still be an inferior solution as long as it doesn't provide for metadata > consistency. > > Maybe this could become some kind of Linux Foundation or FSF joint effort? > Together with advertising and advocacy of free software users this could > probably really replace VFAT in the long term. > > What do you think? What other features would make sense to for such a > filesystem. > > I am willing to test such a filesystem and help with documentation as well > as advocacy. But for coding I better start with something easier ;-). > > [1] > http://www.h-online.com/open/TomTom-Microsoft-settle-patent-dispute--/news/ >112964 > > Ciao, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
